knowledge and politicsの例文

• Unger asserts that " the truth of knowledge and politics is both made and discovered in history ."
• ""'Knowledge and Politics " "'is a 1975 book by philosopher and politician Roberto Mangabeira Unger.
• Understanding this unity between the universal and particular sets the stage for Unger's positive theory in " Knowledge and Politics ".
• Karsten Harries, writing in the " Yale Law Journal ", offered a more skeptical assessment of the merits of " Knowledge and Politics ".
• The theory of organic groups, which he will explore at the end of " Knowledge and Politics ", describes a setting in which these conditions are satisfied.
• As Unger explained earlier in " Knowledge and Politics ", analysis and individualism reflect belief in the principle of aggregation, while synthesis and collectivism reflect a belief in totality.
• His method was not to deny such notions, but to historicize them, examining what in the supposedly necessary may be contingent, and demonstrating the relationships between knowledge and politics, power and knowledge.
• He also established the World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Politics, organising the first editions of the Forum, held in Italy ( 2004 ), Turkey ( 2007 ) and South Korea ( 2009 ).
• Unger opens " Knowledge and Politics " by explaining how he intends to criticize liberal doctrine and how that criticism will help lead to, and elucidate, a positive program : the creation of a nonliberal doctrine of mind and society.
• Duxbury acknowledges Unger's commitment to " straddle the frontiers of social theory " in both " Knowledge and Politics " and " Law in Modern Society ", calling this persistence in addressing the most difficult questions of social theory a " defining feature of the book . " However, Duxbury finds fault with the book, contending that
• Unger contends that this theory of self solves two central problems with which " Knowledge and Politics " is concerned : first, it offers an outline of an alternative to liberalism ( and its metaphysical emphasis on transcendence ) and also to the antitheses of liberalism, the various systems emphasizing immanence ( principally, the welfare-corporate state and socialism ).
• Richards went on to say that " Unger's theory, like Marx's, fundamentally misconstrues the ideals of political, social, and economic justice on the model of personal love . " Richards concluded his review by speculating that behind " Knowledge and Politics " " lies a kind of poetic reverie for a lost love or childhood, which theory now apocalyptically validates ."
• Leff continues his critique of attempts to find normative rules in law and morality in " Law and Technology : On shoring up a Void ", " Unspeakable Ethics, Unnatural Law " ( alluding to the title of a collection of stories by Donald Barthelme ), and his review of Robert Unger's " Knowledge and Politics " in the form of a letter from The Devil.
• Insofar as one can understand the substantive nature of his moral ideal, however, it seems deeply flawed, and indeed itself morally indefensible . " Describing Unger's moral theory in " Knowledge and Politics " as " Platonic and Marxist, " Richards identified in the book an " organic analogy " between the state and a " complete, fully developed, and abundant human self . " According to Richards, " [ o ] rganic analogies, whether in Plato, Marx, or Unger, are intrinsically totalitatian . ".
• His major contributions in this area include The study of schooling : Field methodologies in educational research and evaluation ( 1981 ), Teacher education : A critical examination of its folklore, theory, and practice ( 1987 ), The formation of the school subject-matter : The struggle for creating an American institution ( 1987 ), Critical theories in education : Changing terrains of knowledge and politics ( 1997 ), Cultural history and education : Critical studies on knowledge and schooling ( 2001 ), Governing children, families, and education : Restructuring the welfare state ( 2003 ), and Education research and policy : Steering the knowledge-based economy ( 2006 ).
• Jerome Neu, writing in the " Texas Law Review ", lauded " Knowledge and Politics " as " breathtaking in its sweep, impressive in its erudition, and vast in its ambitions . . . . The book is remarkable both for how much it undertakes and how much it achieves . " Neu identified some weaknesses in the book, contending that while " Unger's succinct survey of positions in legal theory and their interconnections is illuminating, I think it may oversimplify matters . " Further, Neu applauded the tight organization of the book, but allowed that " [ w ] hile Unger's architectonic gives structure to his argument, it ( like Kant's ) sometimes makes things more complicated than necessary . " Neu also took issue with Unger's account of the interconnections between the basic principles of liberal psychology and liberal political theory, arguing that " the nature of the interconnection is somewhat obscure because it varies from points to point and cannot be covered in the general manner attempted by Unger . " Overall, Neu gave high praise to " Knowledge and Politics ", writing, " I fear that I may not have properly conveyed a sense of the book's richness of texture . . . . In all, the book is controlled and informed, and affords a brilliant display of the synthesizing and speculative philosophical intelligence at work . ".
• Jerome Neu, writing in the " Texas Law Review ", lauded " Knowledge and Politics " as " breathtaking in its sweep, impressive in its erudition, and vast in its ambitions . . . . The book is remarkable both for how much it undertakes and how much it achieves . " Neu identified some weaknesses in the book, contending that while " Unger's succinct survey of positions in legal theory and their interconnections is illuminating, I think it may oversimplify matters . " Further, Neu applauded the tight organization of the book, but allowed that " [ w ] hile Unger's architectonic gives structure to his argument, it ( like Kant's ) sometimes makes things more complicated than necessary . " Neu also took issue with Unger's account of the interconnections between the basic principles of liberal psychology and liberal political theory, arguing that " the nature of the interconnection is somewhat obscure because it varies from points to point and cannot be covered in the general manner attempted by Unger . " Overall, Neu gave high praise to " Knowledge and Politics ", writing, " I fear that I may not have properly conveyed a sense of the book's richness of texture . . . . In all, the book is controlled and informed, and affords a brilliant display of the synthesizing and speculative philosophical intelligence at work . ".